Pope Benedict’s controversial statement in a Brazil bishops conference on the ready acceptance by South American Indians of the Catholic faith resonates across the Pacific Ocean to the Philippines.
The Pope’s speech was a rousing call to reinvigorate the local clergy in a country whose Catholic population of 120 million has decreased by over 15% in the past two decades.
The Pope in outlining the history of the Christian faith in Latin America noted the “…encounter between that faith and the indigenous people” and the emergence of the “Christian culture of this Continent” with a “…shared creed that give rise to a great underlying harmony…”

Glossing over the Spanish and Portuguese conquest of the region which entailed the extermination of millions of native Indians to secure this Christian culture, the Pope’s most ahistorical remarks centers on his charge that the early American Indians were looking for “…and welcoming Christ, the unknown God whom their ancestors were seeking, without realizing it, in their rich religious traditions. Christ is the Savior for whom they were silently longing.”
Every Native American Studies Department in the Americas has on its reading list Bartolome de las Casas’ “A Brief Account of the Destruction of the Indies.” De las Casas detailed the genocide and wholesale destruction of the Taino Indians in the West Indies several decades after Christopher Columbus arrived in those parts. As a priest, de las Casas pleaded with then King Phillip II that the decimation of the Indians which he numbered at three million through wars, diseases and slave labor would end all attempts at converting the Indians. Of course. A dead Indian cannot be converted.
How could a population “silently longing” for Christianity’s arrival be so greeted with barbarism? Pope Benedict conveniently puts aside the conqueror mindset which believed that any lands and people “discovered” were theirs and such ownership included the coercive right to Christianize the natives. If they resisted, and they did, the conquerors had the right to kill them.
A clue to the Pope’s imbroglio can be found in a similar “silent longing” scenario foisted on Philippine history and still reverberates in current tourism brochures and pop history articles.

The arrival of the Spanish Conquistadores in the Philippines just twenty years after their arrival in the Americas is made to look convivial. The natives were reported to be friendly providing food and bartering with the Spanish. There was a mass in Cebu and Rajah Humabon and his queen were baptized, and breaking with Christian monogamous practices, baptized the King’s other wives as well. The acceptance of the Christian god along with the planting of the cross on Philippine soil (the same cross allegedly) still stands now gated, covered, and a tourist attraction. A model of the Child Jesus, the very same one given to the queen by Magellan and found, miraculously forty years later is now enshrined in a Cebu church. One hundred years ago this model was photographed and referred to as the Black Santo Nino of Cebu. Now, miraculously, he is depicted as blonde and blue eyed, another vestige of our ongoing colonial mentality.
The Pope would probably be happy to rest his case on these various proofs of a similar “silent longing” by the natives. Unfortunately, selected historical tidbits don’t make a story.
From various Spanish chroniclers we piece a bonhomie encounter truncated by Spanish objectives. Demands of fealty to the Spanish crown were scoffed at by the natives. Feeling cheated with the bartering and cautious with the menacing swords and guns and cannons, the natives decided not to be too hospitable with sharing their food. The first mass and ardor for conversion by Rajah Humabon and his retinue quickly dissipated upon seeing Magellan’s men go on drunken raping sprees.
Apologists for Magellan’s demise in the hands of nearby ruler warrior Lapu Lapu sympathetically chide the explorer for having gotten in the way of island rivalries. But first hand accounts of the survivors paint Magellan not just a political kingmaker but messianic and obsessive in converting natives. Lapu Lapu though would not submit to a foreign king and god and Magellan’s orders to burn their Mactan village enraged the warriors further killing Magellan and sending his wounded men into hasty retreat.

Magellan’s promise to make Rajah Humabon be top Rajah of all the islands if he converted was no longer in the cards. Humabon quickly dispensed with his baptismal name (Charles after the Spanish King) and chased the remaining Spanish survivors away from his island.
Forty years later, the Spanish ships of Miguel Lopez de Legazpi attempted to anchor in Cebu thinking Christian devotees would greet them. Upon seeing their ships the natives gathered belongings and provisions and went into the interior. Legazpi threatened war if the natives did not submit and feed them. A rare but very clear response came back “ Be it so,” The armed Indians on shore answered boldly. “Come on! We await you here.” The Indians could not be coerced.
The Spaniards torched their homes and in their looting came across the Child Jesus idol, presumably the same one given to the queen. Instead of native defiance against foreign invaders, the tourist brochures and the church historians would weave a miracle story and a testament of Christian endurance.
The first hundred years of Spanish history in the Philippines is replete with native revolts and a persistent return to the old ways including their native religion. Meanwhile the Spaniards systematically destroyed all native idols they could find (several of them called anitos can still be viewed in the National Museum) and persecuted native priestesses and priests who continued their practices. If the Philippines became the Catholic country that it is today ( its current membership also on the decline) it was not without the same decimation of its population as that encountered in the Americas. Filipinos died by the tens of thousands through hamletting in “Christian pueblos,” slave labor and outright massacre at the hands of the Christian invaders.
Pope Benedict’s idyllic rendition of the Spanish Conquest of the Americas is an erroneous and dangerous viewpoint that attempts to expunge any of the more egregious actions committed in the name of Christianity on native peoples. One can make a similar comparison to a recent and also controversial remark by another head of state, Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe that the “comfort women” of Southeast Asia were not coerced into servicing the Japanese Military in World War II. Even worse, since 2005, any reference to “comfort women” have been removed in Japanese high school history text books. Rape, genocide and plunder are being erased and conveniently forgotten to instill more acceptable and palatable versions of a country’s history. Good for trade and the further conversion of souls.
Accepting the current Papal version of Christianization in the colonies denigrates the religious heritage of pre-Spanish peoples and goes against a previous and most enlightened Papal Encyclical entitled Dignitatis Humanae shepherded by Pope John XXIII and promulgated by Pope Paul VI at the close of the Second Vatican Council in 1965. Its declaration on a human being’s right to religious freedom launched ecumenism and a respect and tolerance for all religions. It was also the Catholic Church’s repudiation of its past coercive and bloody efforts at evangelization.
Most importantly, this current Papal view implies an obeisance to colonial invasion and erases the native revolt against it. This alienates a people to its past and emasculates its will to assert itself as a nation. A nation’s survival and growth rests significantly on a collective knowledge of its true past.
John L. Silva is the Senior Consultant for the National Museum




